Sunday, August 26, 2007

History Channel presents '9/11 Conspiracies: Fact or Fiction'

It doesn't take long to figure out whose side the History Channel is on. According to the History Channel "The 9/11 Commission Report" is not a conspiracy theory—the other theories are. Those speaking in support of "The 9/11 Commission Report" are "Experts"—others are not so designated.

Beyond the obvious bias the History Channel makes no effort to explain why Bin Laden is not wanted for 9/11 by the FBI, the lack of Arab names on the passenger lists, why airplane parts at the Pentagon were not matched to their serial numbers, why the government refuses to release photos from Pentagon cameras and the film it confiscated from the Sheraton Hotel and the nearby gas station, the presence of molten metal in the basement of World Trade Center 1 and 2, the lack of any government explanation for the speed with which World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7 collapsed, . . .

Saturday, August 25, 2007

Mainstream journalist questions the 'truth' about 9/11

Robert Fisk, a highly respected journalist on the Middle East, admits he is "increasingly troubled at the inconsistencies in the official narrative of 9/11. It's not just the obvious non sequiturs: where are the aircraft parts (engines, etc) from the attack on the Pentagon? Why have the officials involved in the United 93 flight (which crashed in Pennsylvania) been muzzled? Why did flight 93's debris spread over miles when it was supposed to have crashed in one piece in a field? . . .

"If it is true, for example, that kerosene burns at 820C under optimum conditions, how come the steel beams of the twin towers – whose melting point is supposed to be about 1,480C – would snap through at the same time? (They collapsed in 8.1 and 10 seconds.) What about the third tower – the so-called World Trade Centre Building 7 (or the Salmon Brothers Building) – which collapsed in 6.6 seconds in its own footprint at 5.20pm on 11 September?"

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

NIST Fire Science Division Chief calls for independent review

"James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), has called for an independent review of NIST’s investigation into the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11" writes Alan Miller in opednews.com.

Sunday, August 05, 2007

Saturday, August 04, 2007

Watch for another 9/11-WMD experience

A number of pundits have concluded that the reason the Democrats have not brought a halt to Bush’s follies is that they expect Bush’s unpopular policies to provide them with a landslide victory next year.  

There is a problem with this reasoning. It assumes that Cheney, Rove, and the Republicans are ignorant of these facts or are content for the Republican Party to be destroyed after Bush has his warmonger-police state fling. “After me, the deluge.”

Isn’t it more likely that Cheney and Rove have in mind events that will, once again, rally the people behind President Bush and the Republican Party that is fighting the “war on terror” that the Democrats “want to lose”?