Friday, December 25, 2009

Ex-CIA operative warns of terror attack

Henry Crumpton, the ex-CIA mastermind of the war on the Taliban and al Qaeda in Afghanistan right after 9/11, also tells 60 Minutes correspondent Lara Logan the U.S. needs to be in Pakistan making deals with locals to fight the Qaeda and Taliban leaders hiding there.

Tuesday, December 01, 2009

Flight 77 door closed for entire flight

According to Flight Data provided by the NTSB, the Flight Deck Door was never opened in flight. How were the hijackers able to gain access to the cockpit, remove the pilots, and navigate the aircraft to the Pentagon if the Flight Deck Door remained closed?

Wednesday, November 25, 2009

Wikileaks publishes September 11 pager messages

The Wikileaks website is publishing pager messages sent on the day by 9/11 witnesses.

Monday, November 23, 2009

Secret files show UK courts were misled over 9/11 suspect Lotfi Raissi

Rather than release Raissi when it emerged there was insufficient evidence to charge him, law enforcement officials in the UK colluded with the FBI to obtain a warrant for his extradition. There was no evidence to justify a warrant for terrorism, so Raissi was requested on charges relating to an allegation that he failed to disclose his knee surgery in a pilot application.

Tuesday, November 17, 2009

Flight 77: FBI exhibit contradicts Solicitor General's account of Barbara Olson's phone calls on 9/11


According to Marc Fisher and Don Phillips of the Washington Post, Barbara K. Olson called her husband twice in the final minutes. Her last words to him were, "What do I tell the pilot to do?"

"She called from the plane while it was being hijacked," said Theodore Olson — 42nd Solicitor General of the United States. "I wish it wasn't so, but it is."

"The two conversations each lasted about a minute, said Tim O'Brien, a CNN reporter and friend of the Olsons."

However, FBI exhibit P200054 from the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui contradicts the Solicitor General's account. It shows that Barbara Olson made only one phone call — it did not connect, and it lasted for 0 seconds.

Mr. Olson's account appeared on the front page of the Washington Post on September 12, 2001, and is repeated in The 9/11 Commission Report.

We've contacted Mr. Olson (tolson@gibsondunn.com) for comments.

Friday, November 13, 2009

9/11 trial: an amicus curiae brief from the 9/11 truth movement?

Amicus curiae is a legal Latin phrase, literally translated as "friend of the court", that refers to someone, not a party to a case, who volunteers to offer information on a point of law or some other aspect of the case to assist the court in deciding a matter before it. The information may be a legal opinion in the form of a brief, a testimony that has not been solicited by any of the parties, or a learned treatise on a matter that bears on the case. The decision whether to admit the information lies with the discretion of the court.

Obama promises 9/11 mastermind will get a fair trial

Wednesday, November 11, 2009

The 14 Israeli art students were in the WTC towers

In January, 2001, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), Office of Security Programs (IS), began to receive reports of Israeli art students attempting to penetrate several DEA Field Offices in the continental United States. Additionally, there have been reports of Israeli art students visiting the homes of numerous DEA employees. These incidents have occurred since at least the beginning of 2000, and have continued to the present.

Friday, November 06, 2009

United Airlines Flight 175: Questions raised about flying a Boeing 767 at the speeds reported

Pilots For 9/11 Truth have recently analyzed data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board in terms of a "Radar Data Impact Speed Study" in which the NTSB determines speeds of 510 knots and 430 knots for United 175 (South Tower) and American 11 (North Tower), respectively.

Pilots For 9/11 Truth conclude that, "It is impossible for the alleged United 175 to achieve the speeds reported by the NTSB using EA990 as a benchmark."

Sunday, November 01, 2009

Osama Bin Laden and 9/11: The Evidence

The idea that Osama bin Laden was responsible for the 9/11 attacks has been an article of faith for public officials and the mainstream media. Calling it an “article of faith” points to two features of this idea. On the one hand, no one in these circles publicly challenges this idea. . . .

Wednesday, October 21, 2009

Saturday, October 10, 2009

BOOK REVIEW: 'The Ground Truth: The Untold Story of America Under Attack on 9/11'

“The Ground Truth: The Untold Story of America Under Attack on 9/11,” by John Farmer — senior counsel to the 9/11 Commission, claims that the government presented a “fundamentally false version of events”. If this leads some to believe that Mr. Farmer will present the true version of events, they will be disappointed.

What the book does is expose the shortcomings of the government’s response to the hijackings on 9/11. Mr. Farmer does not question the identity of the hijackers although several were later reported by British newspapers as being alive.

He accepts the official version that 9/11 was directed by Osama Bin Laden although Bin Laden himself denied that to a Pakistani newspaper, and the FBI says they have no hard evidence against Bin Laden. They do not even mention 9/11 in their "Most Wanted Terrorists" poster of Bin Laden!

Mr. Farmer’s book basically describes how the hijackers were able to penetrate multiple layers of U.S. security: National Security Agency, Central Intelligence Agency, FBI, the State Department’s visa offices, and airline screening.

His book may be useful to those wishing to “reinvent government.” Until that is done, says Farmer, the passage of new statutes, or the creation of new procedures, or the creation of the Department of Homeland Security leaves the U.S. vulnerable to “terrorist” attacks.

Mr. Farmer does not address the mounting evidence that the twin towers and Building 7 of the World Trade Center were demolished with explosives. He does seem to admit that United Airlines Flight 93 may have been shot down, but he makes no reference to the lack of hard evidence that American Airlines Flight 77 struck the Pentagon.

Indeed his failure to address the evidence is particularly striking where he refers to the phone calls made by the passengers and crew of Flight 93 and Flight 77.

The claim that Flight 77 passenger Barbara Olson called her husband, Justice Department's Solicitor General Ted Olson, twice, was contradicted at the Zacarias Moussaoui trial in 2006.

The FBI reported that only two cell phone calls were made from all four planes — both from United Flight 93.

Mr. Farmer may have done the 9/11 truth movement a favor. By revealing the government's conspiracy to lie about its response to 9/11, Mr. Farmer casts doubt on ALL the findings of the 9/11 Commission.

REVIEWED by Enver Masud
Founder, The Wisdom Fund

Wednesday, September 30, 2009

The 9/11 Commission rejects own report as based on government lies


The 9/11 Commission now tells us that the official version of 9/11 was based on false testimony and documents and is almost entirely untrue. The details of this massive cover-up are carefully outlined in a book by John Farmer, who was the Senior Counsel for the 9/11 Commission.

Saturday, September 26, 2009

FBI payout for Egyptian over 9/11

An Egyptian man has received a $250,000 payout from the FBI because of the way he was treated following the 11 September 2001 terrorist attacks.

Monday, September 14, 2009

Israel and 9/11

The greatest threat to world peace is not terrorists. The greatest threat is the US-Israeli relationship. In the same way that a decade of pre-staging was required to plausibly induce the US to invade Iraq, a similar strategy is now underway to persuade the US to invade Iran or to support and condone an attack by Israel.

Sunday, September 13, 2009

9/11 'mastermind' ??

Israeli National Security Advisor Uzi Arad, who was the former director of intelligence for Israel's Mossad and banned from the United States in 2004, was “most assuredly” the “mastermind” behind the hijacking of the Arctic Sea for a planned attack upon the US as Russian Intelligence Officials have long suspected him of being one of the “main perpetrators” of the September 11, 2001 attacks upon America.

Saturday, September 12, 2009

Would you still sign the 9/11 Truth petition?

City of New York concedes 9/11 coalition has 30,000 valid signatures for a referendum

In a last minute decision, lawyers for the City of New York have conceded that the New York City Coalition for Accountability Now (NYC CAN), a group comprising 9/11 family members, first responders and survivors, indeed did submit over 30,000 valid signatures to put the referendum for a new 9/11 investigation before the voters of New York City this November.

Friday, September 11, 2009

9/11: Neither before nor since . . .

On September 11, 2001, there occurred five events which, as far as we know, are unique in world history. According to official accounts:

At 9:59 A.M., 110-story Two World Trade Center (the South Tower), having been struck by United Airlines Flight 175 at 9:03 A.M., collapsed at near free fall speed.

At 10:28 A.M., 110-story One World Trade Center (the North Tower), having been struck by American Airlines Flight 11 at 8:47 A.M., collapsed at near free fall speed.

The 110-story North and South Towers remained standing after being struck by Boeing 767s. They collapsed — we’re told — due to fire. No steel frame tower has collapsed due to fire, neither before 9/11 nor since 9/11.

At 9:38 A.M., American Airlines Flight 93, a Boeing 757, struck the Pentagon at 530 mph, and unlike other aircraft disasters, disappeared leaving no identifiable fuselage, wings, or tail outside.

At 10:03 A.M., United Airlines Flight 93, a Boeing 757, crashed in a field in Pennsylvania leaving a crater about the size of a large automobile, debris scattered over a few miles, and unlike other aircraft disasters, only tiny pieces “no larger than a phonebook” at the site of the crash.

At 5:20 P.M., 47-story Seven World Trade Center collapsed at near free fall speed. The 9/11 Commission chose not to even mention its collapse in their final report.

Seven World Trade Center was not struck by a plane. It collapsed — we’re told — due to fire. No steel frame tower has collapsed due to fire, neither before 9/11 nor since 9/11. On 9/11, three did.

Five events on 9/11 — unheard of before 9/11, since 9/11. Coincidence or coverup?

We don’t believe the official account, and neither do many American patriots.

Enver Masud
Founder, The Wisdom Fund

Thursday, September 10, 2009

The Wisdom Fund founder to discuss 9/11 on Durban's Radio Al Ansaar

Enver Masud will be discussing 9/11 on Durban's Radio Al Ansaar Saturday at 10.15 A.M. GMT. Listen live at http://www.alansaar.co.za/.

The Wisdom Fund founder to discuss 9/11 on South Africa's SAfm

To our visitors in Asia, Africa, China, Europe — too early for the Americas

Enver Masud, founder of The Wisdom Fund, will be on South Africa's national radio station SAfm on prime time (8:30 to 9:00 A.M. GMT) on September 11.

To listen live, go to http://www.sabc.co.za/portal/site/sabc/#. Click on 'listen live' and select 'SA FM' from the drop-down menu.

Conspiracy theory or hidden truth? The 9/11 enigmas...

Wednesday, September 09, 2009

Breaking: Charlie Sheen demands Obama meeting on 9/11 cover-up

NEW BOOK: 'The Mysterious Collapse of World Trade Center 7: Why the Final Official Report About 9/11 Is Unscientific and False'

Author, David Ray Griffin, demonstrates that NIST is guilty of the most serious types of scientific fraud: fabricating, falsifying, and ignoring evidence.

Tuesday, September 08, 2009

Free online book: 'Solving 9/11: The Deception that Changed the World'

Author event: "Pentagon 9/11" by Diane Putney

Diane Putney of the history office of the Secretary of Defense is scheduled to discuss "Pentagon 9/11," a documented history based on more than 1300 interviews about the attack on the Pentagon. Here are some questions for Ms. Putney?

1 - What hard evidence is there that Flight 77 struck the Pentagon?

2 - Did you interview Captain Michael Defina, of the National Airport's aircraft rescue firefighters (ARFF), who claims that ARFF foam units "knocked down the bulk of the fire in the first seven minutes after their arrival"?

3 - At 9:38 AM, Fort Myers Fire Department Foam Unit 161 was reported on fire at the Pentagon in the Arlington County After-Action Report. Did you interview the captain of Unit 161, and ask him when they arrived at the Pentagon?

4 - 85 videotapes have been requested under the Freedom of Information Act. Why won't the government release them?

5 - Serial numbers on aircraft parts have been requested under the Freedom of Information Act by Aidan Monaghan. Why won't the government release these serial numbers?

6 - Did you interview Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski, who witnessed "an unforgettable fireball, 20 to 30 feet in diameter", and noted "a strange absence of airliner debris.

7 - Did you interview any of the witnesses who claim that multiple standard-issue, battery-operated wall clocks . . . stopped between 9:31 and 9:32-1/2", i.e. about 5 minutes before "Flight 77" struck the Pentagon?

8 - Did you interview April Gallop who has a lawsuit pending in the UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK? Ms Gallop claims that she was "at her desk, with her baby, in her office on the first floor, when large explosions occurred, walls crumbled and the ceiling fell in. Although her desk is just some forty feet from the supposed impact point, and she went out through the blown-open front of the building afterwards, she never saw any sign that an airliner crashed through"?

Enver Masud
The Wisdom Fund

Monday, September 07, 2009

Saturday, September 05, 2009

'9/11 Science and Conspiracy'

Tonight, 9:00 PM EST, the National Geographic Channel will air "9/11 Science and Conspiracy: Experiments with heated steel and thermite illuminate the truth behind questions surrounding the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks."

According to one reviewer, "the special aims to address some of the most common connivances espoused by wackos like Rosie O'Donnell."

Appeals court rules against Ashcroft in 9/11 case

A federal appeals court delivered a stinging rebuke Friday to the Bush administration's post-Sept. 11 detention policies, ruling that former Attorney General John Ashcroft can be held liable for people who were wrongfully detained as material witnesses after 9/11.

A three-judge panel of the 9th U.S. Circuit Court of Appeals said the government's improper use of material witnesses after Sept. 11 was "repugnant to the Constitution and a painful reminder of some of the most ignominious chapters of our national history."

Friday, September 04, 2009

CBC to air documentary on World Trade Center

9/11 Conspiracy Files: The Third Tower delves into one of mysteries surrounding Sept. 11th, a third tower at the World Trade Centre, which along with the Twin Towers, collapsed on that fateful day. But this skyscraper was never hit by a plane.

Obama official denies being part of '9/11 Truth' movement

Monday, August 31, 2009

FEMA videographer at Ground Zero goes public

There were many things, in hindsight, that were disturbing at Ground Zero. It was odd to me that I was dispatched to go to New York even before the second plane hit the South Tower, while the media was still reporting only that a “small plane” had collided with the North Tower — far too small of a catastrophe at that point to involve FEMA . FEMA was mobilized within minutes, whereas it took ten days for it to deploy to New Orleans to respond to Hurricane Katrina, even with abundant advance warning! It was odd to me that all cameras were so fiercely prohibited within the secured perimeter of Ground Zero, that the entire area was declared a crime scene and yet the “evidence” within that crime scene was so rapidly removed and destroyed. And then it was very odd to me when I learned that FEMA and several other federal agencies had already moved into position at their command center at Pier 92 on September 10th, one day before the attacks!

. . . We are asked to believe that all four of the “indestructible” black boxes of the two jets that struck the twin towers were never found because they were completely vaporized, yet I have footage of the rubber wheels of the landing gear nearly undamaged, as well as the seats, parts of the fuselage and a jet turbine that were absolutely not vaporized. This being said, I do find it rather odd that such objects could have survived fairly intact the type of destruction that turned most of the Twin Towers into thin dust. And I definitely harbor some doubts about the authenticity of the “jet” turbine, far too small to have come from one of the Boeings!

. . . When the North Tower fell, the US Customs House (Building 6) was crushed and totally incinerated. Much of the underground levels beneath it were also destroyed. But there were voids. And it was into one of those voids, recently uncovered, that I descended with a special Task Force to investigate. It was there we found the security antechamber to the vault, badly damaged. At the far end of the security office was the wide steel door to the vault, a combination code keypad in the cinderblock wall beside it. But the wall was cracked and partially crumbled, and the door was sprung partially open. So we checked inside with our flashlights. Except for several rows of empty shelves, there was nothing in the vault but dust and debris. It had been emptied. Why was it empty? And when could it have been emptied?

Pentagon 9/11: witness accounts

September 11, 2001

9:32 a.m. — Reports of “massive damage to the west side of the building . . . Multiple standard-issue, battery-operated wall clocks . . . stopped between 9:31 and 9:32-1/2”. (Barbara Honegger, "The Pentagon Attack Papers," physics911.net, September 6, 2006)

9:xx — Captain Defina arrives at Pentagon "two to three minutes" after seeing a plume of smoke, and his FMFD Engine 331 "knocked down the bulk of the fire in the first seven minutes after their arrival". (Stephen Murphy, National Fire Protection Association Journal, November 1, 2001)

9:37:46 — Flight 77 traveling at 530 mph strikes the Pentagon (The 9/11 Commission Report, p10)

Morning — “From my close up inspection there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. . . . . The only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage - nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon. . . . It wasn't till about 45 minutes later . . . that all of the floors collapsed.” (CNN Senior Correspondent Jamie McIntyre)

Morning — Colonel Karen Kwiatkowski, who witnessed "an unforgettable fireball, 20 to 30 feet in diameter", notes “a strange absence of airliner debris, . . . This visible evidence or lack thereof may also have been apparent to the secretary of defense, who in an unfortunate slip of the tongue referred to the aircraft that slammed into the Pentagon as a 'missile'." (9/11 and American Empire)

"Gen. Larry Arnold, revealed that he ordered one of his jets to fly down low over the Pentagon shortly after the attack that morning, and that his pilot reported back that there was no evidence that a plane had hit the building." (Barbara Honegger, "The Pentagon Attack Papers," physics911.net, September 6, 2006)

September 12, 2001

10:16 a.m. — Arlington County Fire Chief Ed Plaugher, at briefing with Assistant Secretary Victoria Clarke, when asked: "Is there anything left of the aircraft at all?" said: "there are some small pieces of aircraft ... there's no fuselage sections and that sort of thing." . . . Reporters on the scene were "handcuffed and dragged away". (DOD Transcript)

September 15, 2001

11:00 a.m. — Question during presentation by Lee Evey, Pentagon Renovation Manager: “One thing that's confusing – if it came in the way you described, at an angle, why then are not the wings outside? I mean, the wings would have shorn off. The tail would have shorn off. And yet there's apparently no evidence of the aircraft outside the E ring.” (DOD Transcript)

Later

“At the Pentagon, the plaintiff was at her desk, with her baby, in her office on the first floor, when large explosions occurred, walls crumbled and the ceiling fell in. Although her desk is just some forty feet from the supposed impact point, and she went out through the blown-open front of the building afterwards, she never saw any sign that an airliner crashed through.” (UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT SOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORK by APRIL GALLOP, for Herself and as Mother and Next Friend of ELISHA GALLOP, a Minor)

-- Compiled by Enver Masud

9/11: The official account of Flight 77 defies the laws of science

"The official account of Flight 77 on September 11, 2001 defies the laws of science," says Mr. Enver Masud — an engineer.

Calculations based on its Flight Data Recorder (FDR), prove that American Airlines Flight 77 could not have struck the Pentagon in the manner described in official reports.

Given the topography, and the flight path defined by the FDR data provided by the National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB), anyone competent in geometry and physics can calculate the force exerted on “Flight 77” when it would have to transition from its downward path to level flight prior to striking the Pentagon.

Reconstructing Flight 77’s path from the FDR data is not a trivial exercise. It requires expensive software, and details of the topography below the alleged flight path. Pilots for 9/11 acquired the software, and painstakingly drew the topography to simulate “Flight 77’s” path.

From the flight path information provided by Pilots for 9/11 Truth, we calculate a downward force on “Flight 77” of 33 times the force of gravity, i.e. 33 Gs, when the aircraft would have to transition from its downward path to level flight about 200 yards in front of the Pentagon.

The Boeing 757 would act as if it had increased its weight by 8,276,850 lbs, or 32 times its normal weight.

Flight 77 could not possibly survive this G-Force.

Had Flight 77 attempted this maneuver, it would have crashed on the lawn in front of the Pentagon — the pilot would not have been any condition to fly with "the top of the fuselage of the aircraft no more than 20 ft above the ground" (Pentagon Building Performance Report, p14).

Therefore, Flight 77 could not be the object seen flying level across the Pentagon lawn at "530 miles per hour" (The 9/11 Commission Report, p10) in the Pentagon security camera film.

This single fact — the G-Force on “Flight 77” — is sufficient to refute the official account of Flight 77.

Sunday, August 30, 2009

Pentagon 9/11: A documented history of the September 11, 2001, attack on the Pentagon

"DIANE PUTNEY, Historical Office of the Secretary of Defense, will discuss the day of the attack, its aftermath, impact on Pentagon building and its occupants, the compelling rescue and recovery effort.

"Defense Historian, Alfred Goldberg, Ms. Putney and other authors worked from more than 1300 oral history interviews to create
PENTAGON 9/11, a narrative in words and pictures."

The event is at the Arlington Public Library, on Thursday, September 10, 2009, 7:00 PM.

Will Ms. Putney answer the issues we've raised?

Friday, August 28, 2009

Woman held in psychiatric ward for questioning 9/11

I was wrongly diagnosed as delusional by the psychiatric staff of Ward 7 at Northland Base Hospital in Whangarei [New Zealand] and held against my will for 11 days in mid-2006, because I maintained the attacks of 9/11 were orchestrated by criminal elements inside the US Administration.

Thursday, August 27, 2009

9/11 aims to become single largest day of service

President Barack Obama is asking Americans to volunteer on Sept. 11, making this year's anniversary of the terror attacks the first National Day of Service and Remembrance, organizers announced Thursday.

The real service would be to determine the truth about what really happened on September 11, 2001.

Sunday, August 23, 2009

Detainee to question 9/11 suspect

A federal judge has granted a prisoner challenging his detention by the military at Guantánamo Bay, Cuba, permission to ask questions of Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, the self-proclaimed mastermind of Al Qaeda’s Sept. 11 plot who is the camp’s most notorious inmate.

Question to National Geographic re '9/11: Science and Conspiracy'

Scientific Evidence Proves Official Account of 'Flight 77' Is False: Given the topography, the force generated by the transition of 'Flight 77' from its downward path to level flight would cause the aircraft to crash before striking the Pentagon. How do you plan to rebut this?

More

Wednesday, August 19, 2009

Was Robert Novak father of the 9/11 truth movement?

"Security experts and airline officials agree privately that the simultaneous hijacking of four jetliners was an 'inside job,' probably indicating complicity beyond malfeasance," said Novak in the lead sentence of his weekly column only two days after 9-11.

Novak was not the only journalist to imply that insiders were active in implementing 9-11. New York Times columnist William Safire theorized that the terrorists had assistance from within the major U.S. intelligence agencies.

Monday, August 10, 2009

Judge: CIA interrogations not relevant to 9/11 accused's sanity

U.S. military defense lawyers for accused 9/11 conspirator Ramzi bin al Shibh cannot learn what interrogation techniques CIA agents used on the Yemeni before he was moved to Guantánamo to be tried as a terrorist, an Army judge has ruled. . . .

Tuesday, August 04, 2009

Scientist changes mind on cause of WTC collapse

Dr. Frank Greening has apparently changed his mind regarding the cause of collapse of the World Trade Center.

On March 1, 2005, Dr. Greening wrote: "An analysis of the energetics of the WTC collapse events has shown that the kinetic energy of the aircraft collisions and the subsequent gravitational energy released by the descending blocks of floors were quite sufficient to destroy the twin towers in the manner observed. The use of explosive devices in either of the two towers is not necessary to explain the collapse events and is considered to be highly unlikely."

Today, speaking on “FAIR & BALANCED” with Kevin Barrett, he expressed his doubts.

Virginia, New York courts vie for 9/11 case

The U.S. attorney's offices in Alexandria and Manhattan are embroiled in intense competition over the opportunity to prosecute Khalid Sheik Mohammed, the self-proclaimed mastermind of the Sept. 11, 2001.

Friday, July 31, 2009

Sibel Edmonds: Bin Laden worked for US till 9/11

These 'intimate relations' included using Bin Laden for 'operations' in Central Asia, including Xinjiang, China. These 'operations' involved using al Qaeda and the Taliban in the same manner "as we did during the Afghan and Soviet conflict," that is, fighting 'enemies' via proxies.

Tuesday, July 28, 2009

VIDEO: 'Zero: an investigation into 9/11'

This brand new feature documentary from Italian production company Telemaco explores the latest scientific evidence and reveals dramatic new witness testimony, which directly conflicts with the US Government's account.

Saturday, July 18, 2009

Pilots for 9/11 Truth sign affidavit in April Gallop lawsuit

April Gallop, a survivor of the Pentagon attack, is suing Cheney, Rumsfeld, Myers and other officials for their possible role in the attack, and failure to evacuate the Pentagon. The lawsuit cites the Flight Data Recorder analysis conducted by Pilots For 9/11 Truth whose affidavit has been provided to the plaintiff.

Wednesday, July 15, 2009

July 21 Talk: 9/11 And Its Impact On Muslims

Talk by Enver Masud, Founder, The Wisdom Fund
Tuesday, July 21, 7:00 PM at the Adel, Iowa Library
Sponsored by 9/11 Truth of Central Iowa

New arguments in Moussaoui case

Zacharias Moussaoui, the only person to stand trial for 9/11, has changed his story and has asked for a new trial.

Tuesday, July 07, 2009

NSA Security running amok to plug leaks about 9/11

WMR has learned that the National Security “Q” Group, responsible for security, has grown to an immense security and counter-intelligence force, with an estimated one thousand government employees, contractors, and paid informants. NSA’s Security force is reportedly primarily tasked with plugging any leaks of classified or other information that points to U.S. government’s involvement with the terrorist attacks on September 11, 2001. . . .

The bottom line is that a number of NSA personnel who were on duty in the months leading up to 9/11, the day of the attacks, and subsequent weeks and months, are aware of undeniable facts that point to a massive cover-up by the Bush-Cheney administration of the circumstances surrounding 9/11, including what actually befell United Airlines flight 93 and who was issuing direct military orders from the White House.

The Obama administration, rather than lessen the pressure on the NSA personnel, has turned up the heat and is resorting to even more draconian methods to ensure silence.

Amazon.com and Barnes & Noble removed review of "Firefight: Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11"

I had submitted a review of "Firefight — Inside the Battle to Save the Pentagon on 9/11" to Amazon.com and Barnes & Noble after attending a talk by the authors (where they refused to answer my questions).

I don't recall the history of the review at Barnes & Noble. The Amazon.com review was accepted, published, and was on Amazon.com for months. It's no longer there. Is this more of the coverup of 9/11?

You may read the review at The Wisdom Fund.

And if you really want to know what happened on 9/11 at the Pentagon, come to the National Security Briefing on July 11.

Thursday, July 02, 2009

Scientific evidence proves official account of 'Flight 77' is false

Given the topography, forces generated by the transition from downward flight to level flight would cause the aircraft to disintegrate before striking the Pentagon.

Monday, June 29, 2009

Court won't hear Sept. 11 claims vs. Saudi Arabia

The Supreme Court has refused to allow victims of the Sept. 11 attacks to pursue lawsuits against Saudi Arabia and four of its princes over charitable donations that were allegedly funneled to al-Qaida.

Monday, June 15, 2009

Gitmo interrogations led them to offer false stories

The government has released new versions of transcripts of hearings held at the Guantanamo Bay detention center, which show Khalid Sheik Mohammed and other accused high-ranking terror detainees saying harsh interrogation methods led them to offer false stories.

Thursday, June 04, 2009

Dear President Obama, here are some 9/11 'facts to be dealt with'

Dear President Obama:

In your speech today in Cairo, you called the attacks of September 11, 2001, "not opinions to be debated" but "facts to be dealt with." I agree.

So let's deal with the facts.

I've summarized important facts in my book "9/11 Unveiled" — an "executive summary" of what happened on that tragic day.

I look forward to your administration dealing with these facts. They lead to a very different conclusion than the one accepted by both your administration, and the previous administration.

On July 11, in collaboration with Citizen Investigation Team, and Pilots for 9/11 Truth, we'll present a National Security Briefing: Deconstructing the 9/11 Pentagon Attack. Our presentation, based on hard facts, refutes the generally accepted theory.

Do send your staff to examine the facts. The truth will surprise you.

Sincerely,
Enver Masud
Founder, The Wisdom Fund

Tuesday, June 02, 2009

Obama sides with Saudi royals against U.S. families in 9/11 lawsuit

The lawsuit was first filed in 2002 and originally asked for $116 trillion. The group now seeks $1 trillion in damages.

Friday, May 15, 2009

National security briefing: deconstructing the 9/11 Pentagon attack

Mark your calendar for Saturday, July 11, for this groundbreaking presentation by Citizen Investigation Team and Pilots for 9/11 Truth — sponsored by The Wisdom Fund.

Wednesday, March 25, 2009

NEW MOVIE: '9/11 Unveiled' — coming soon


It's not quite finished, and we have yet to resolve copyright issues.

Tuesday, March 24, 2009

Mr. Obama: Before you finalize your Afghanistan policy . . .

THE WISDOM FUND
TWF.ORG

March 24, 2009

President Barack H. Obama
The White House
1600 Pennsylvania Ave NW
Washington, DC 20500

Dear Mr. President:

Before you finalize your Afghanistan policy, please examine the enclosed book and DVD — 9/11 Unveiled. It is an Executive Summary of several years of research, and shows that much of what we’ve been told about that tragic day — September 11, 2001 — is false.

My varied work experience has taught me how to sift through complex, conflicting facts and opinions to arrive at defensible conclusions. I challenge the 9/11 Commission to defend theirs.

I managed the National Power Grid Study (directed a couple of dozen, multidisciplinary teams — total 150 persons), and the National Electric Reliability Study for the U.S. Department of Energy. I also set up and directed the Operations Review Division at the Iowa Commerce Commission. I’ve consulted for the U.S. Agency for International Development, and the World Bank — in Albania, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana, Indonesia, Latvia, Pakistan, Russia, and Tanzania.

I was recently on a three week lecture tour of South Africa speaking before hundreds every day, interviews on radio and television, etc. Virtually all who listened came away sharing my conclusions. The U.S. embassy declined an invitation from SAfm to rebut me.

If you and your staff have an open mind, I believe you too will agree. Given the current financial crisis, we cannot afford unnecessary wars.

Sincerely,

Enver Masud
Founder, The Wisdom Fund


Copy:
Attorney General Eric H. Holder Jr.
Senator James Webb
Senator Mark Warner
Representative James P. Moran
Representative John Conyers, Jr.
Representative Dennis J. Kucinich
Representative Ron Paul
Marcus W. Brauchli

Monday, February 09, 2009

UK terrorists plan new 9/11 attack on US?

According to Press TV, Iran, "American spy chiefs believe a British-born Pakistani extremist entering the United States under the Visa Waiver Program is likely to be the source of another 9/11-style attack."

Are we being conditioned for a false-flag operation?

Monday, February 02, 2009

The political suspicions of 9/11

A coming episode of the acclaimed FX drama “Rescue Me” will tackle what may sound like a far-fetched plot line: that the attacks of Sept. 11 were an “inside job.” The actor who espouses the theories on camera, it turns out, also subscribes to them in real life.

Wednesday, January 21, 2009

'The 9/11 Commission Report' exposed in the Washington Times today


To expose the "fatally flawed" 9/11 Commission Report, the Wisdom Fund placed a quarter-page advertisement in the Washington Times, Commemorative Section, January 21 (page E7, bottom right).

Hundreds of military and intelligence officials, engineers and architects, pilots and aviation professionals, scholars and media personnel, survivors and family members do not believe 'The 9/11 Commission Report'

Tuesday, January 20, 2009

Cheney: No evidence that Bin Laden responsible for 9/11

On March 29, 2006, on The Tony Snow Show, Vice President Dick Cheney stated: "So we've never made the case, or argued the case, that somehow Osama Bin Laden was directly involved in 9/11. That evidence has never been forthcoming."

Thursday, January 01, 2009

When did Fort Meyer Fire Department Foam Unit 161 arrive at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001?

When did Fort Meyer Fire Department (FMFD) Foam Unit 161, and Metropolitan Washington Airport Authority (MWAA) Foam Unit 331, arrive at the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, and why does it matter?

National Airport's aircraft rescue firefighters (ARFF) foam units "knocked down the bulk of the fire in the first seven minutes after their arrival," said Captain Michael Defina, who was the shift commander that day at Reagon National Airport (National Fire Protection Association Journal, November 1, 2001—original removed, but available elsewhere).

Captain Defina, who had been at the site of a motor vehicle accident, arrived at the Pentagon "two to three minutes" after he "saw a smoke plume arise" from the Pentagon.


FMFD Unit 161 at the Pentagon before Flight 77 strike?

"Captain Defina drove onto the heliport and directed Foam Unit 331 to set up there, where Fort Myer Rescue Engine 161 had established a hydrant water supply. The only other firefighting apparatus he saw on the west side was Arlington County's Engine and Truck 105 on the far north end. Their crews went into the building to conduct search and rescue."


From the photo and diagram above, it appears that the crew of Engine 161 are seen entering the Pentagon's heliport side entrance (shown in the diagram at bottom center). Engine 161 is just left of the entrance. The gap in the Pentagon wall after the collapse of its roof would be on the right—either on the edge, or just off the photo.


"While Foam Unit 331 hit the fire with foam from its roof and bumper turrets, Rescue Engine 335's four-person crew used hand lines in an attempt to control the fires".


MWAA Unit 331 at the Pentagon

Why does this matter?

Let's contruct a timeline of events at the Pentagon, and see if it tells us anything.

9:29 - Flight 77 is at 7000 feet, 38 miles west of the Pentagon (9/11 Commission Report, p9).

9:37 - Flight 77 traveling at 530 mph hits the Pentagon (9/11 Commission Report, p10).

9:38 - FMFD Foam Unit 161 is on fire at the Pentagon (Arlington County After-Action Report, Annex pages A-4 and A-5).

9:xx - Captain Defina arrives at Pentagon "two to three minutes" after seeing a plume of smoke.

9:xx - Captain Defina's Engine 331 "knocked down the bulk of the fire in the first seven minutes after their arrival".

9:40 - FAA grounds all flights at U.S. airports (FOX Facts, May 3, 2006).

9:41 - ACFD fire Truck 105 arrives at the Pentagon Arlington County After-Action Report, Appendix 1).

9:41 - ACFD Battalion Chief Cornwell arrives and assumes Incident Command (Arlington County After-Action Report, Appendix 1).

9:41 - Command established (9/11 Commission Report, p314).

9:48 - ACFD Assistant Chief Schwartz arrives and assumes Incident Command (Arlington County After-Action Report, Appendix 1).

9:55 - Incident commander orders evacuation of impacted areas (9/11 Commission Report, p315).

9:57 - A partial collapse occurs (9/11 Commission Report, p314).

10:15 - Incident commander orders full evacuation (9/11 Commission Report, p315).

Was the "plume of smoke" that Captain Defina saw from the crash of Flight 77, or from the bomb reported at the Pentagon at 9:32 by Barbara Honegger?

The debris seen in the photo of Foam Unit 161 is consistent with an explosion inside the Pentagon. The fires in the photo below appear to have started after Unit 161 arrived, and not the fire "knocked down . . . in the first seven minutes after their arrival" by the crew of Unit 331.


At the Dept. of Defense News Briefing on September 12, 2001, when asked about the "small pieces of the plane virtually all over, out over the highway, tiny pieces", Arlington County Fire Chief Ed Plaugher responded, "I'd rather not comment on that."

Arrival time for Foam Units 161 and 331 are not included in the Arlington County After-Action Report timeline (Appendix 1). Foam Units 161 and 331 are not mentioned in The 9/11 Commission Report.

Pilots for 9/11 Truth
"The Pentagon Building Performance Report," ASCE, January 2003
VIDEO: "Pentagon Witness: Cameraman Bob Pugh," YouTube, May 21, 2008
VIDEO: "Pentagon: Morning of September 11, 2001," YouTube, January 2, 2009