Thursday, April 10, 2008

Former air traffic controller Robin Hordon speaks out

Within three hours of the attacks on the World Trade Center and Pentagon, Robin Hordon knew it was an inside job. He had been an Air Traffic Controller (ATC) for eleven years before Reagan fired him and hundreds of his colleagues after they went on strike in the eighties. Having handled in-flight emergencies and two actual hijackings in his career, he is well qualified to comment on what NORAD should have been able to achieve in its response to the near simultaneous hijacking of four domestic passenger carriers on the morning of September 11th, 2001.

“There had to be something huge to explain why those aircraft weren’t shot down out of the sky. We have fighters on the ready to handle these situations twenty-four-seven. We have NORAD (North American Aerospace Defense Command) monitors monitoring our skies twenty-four-seven. We have a lot of human beings, civilian and military, who care about doing their jobs.”

UN official calls for study of neocons' role in 9/11

On March 26, Richard Falk, Milbank professor of international law emeritus at Princeton University, was named by unanimous vote to a newly created position to report on human rights in the conflict between Israel and the Palestinian Arabs. While Mr. Falk's specialty is human rights and international law, since the attacks in 2001, he has devoted some of his time to challenging what he calls the "9-11 official version."

Friday, April 04, 2008

It has happened: I'm a 9/11 truther

Top Democrats demand Attorney General explain remarks about pre-9/11 phone call

A letter has been sent by leaders of the House Judiciary Committee to Attorney General Michael Mukasey, demanding that he explain a recent public statement that federal authorities failed to intercept a call from suspected terrorists in Afghanistan prior to the 9/11 attacks, when doing so could have prevented the attacks from taking place.

Ted Olson's report of phone calls from Barbara Olson on 9/11: Three official denials

The most serious official contradiction of Ted Olson's story came in 2006 at the trial of Zacarias Moussaoui, the so-called 20th hijacker. The evidence presented to this trial by the FBI included a report on phone calls from all four 9/11 flights. In its report on American Flight 77, the FBI report attributed only one call to Barbara Olson and it was an "unconnected call," which (of course) lasted "0 seconds." According to the FBI, therefore, Ted Olson did not receive a single call from his wife using either a cell phone or an onboard phone.

Thursday, April 03, 2008

Enver Masud to speak on 9/11 in Canton, Michigan

Enver Masud—an engineer and award-winning author—says: “The major conclusions of the 9/11 Commission report are false.”

Enver recently returned from a 3-week, 9/11 lecture tour of South Africa—one TV interview was broadcast to Sub-Saharan Africa, and the U.S. embassy was asked to present opposing views (they failed to respond). Enver is a contributing author of 9/11 and American Empire.

Ventura wrestles with what really happened on 9/11

Minnesota's former governor, Jesse Ventura, says he's been doing some research into the 9/11 attacks on the World Trade Center, and it's looking to him like the truth about what brought buildings down has yet to come out, in part because of a media coverup.

Friday, March 28, 2008

Frontline allowed Cheney to lie

Cheney failed to tell us, that at the same time as the REAL 9/11 attacks, he was personally directing "War Games" DRILLS with imaginary "hijacked airliners" attacking east coast buildings! Air Defenses were confused by 22 imaginary (and real) hijacked aircraft!

Monday, March 17, 2008

'Al Qaeda itself does not exist'

"The Power of Nightmares: The Rise of the Politics of Fear," a three-hour historical film by Adam Curtis recently aired by the British Broadcasting Corp., argues coherently that much of what we have been told about the threat of international terrorism "is a fantasy that has been exaggerated and distorted by politicians. . . .

But the film . . . directly challenges the conventional wisdom by making a powerful case that the Bush administration, led by a tight-knit cabal of Machiavellian neoconservatives, has seized upon the false image of a unified international terrorist threat to replace the expired Soviet empire in order to push a political agenda.

Friday, March 14, 2008

Don't execute 9/11 accused: Mukasey

U.S. Attorney General Michael Mukasey said on Friday he hoped the six Guantanamo prisoners charged with the September 11 attacks on New York and Washington would not receive the death penalty....

Human rights groups call the proceedings a farce, as detainees do not have legal rights normally accorded to U.S. citizens and prisoners of war.

Pakistani Khalid Sheikh Mohammed and five others are charged with crimes including murder, conspiracy and terrorism for the attacks which killed around 3,000 people in 2001.

Tuesday, March 11, 2008

Former Italian president: 9/11 orchestrated by CIA, Mossad

Former Italian president Francesco Cossiga, the man who revealed the existence of Operation Gladio, says that the September 11, 2001 attacks were orchestrated by the CIA and Mossad, and that this was common knowledge amongst global intelligence agencies.

Cossiga's revelations about 9/11 were published last week in Italy's oldest, and widely read, newspaper—Corriere della Sera.

Roughly translated from Italian, Cossiga says, "the disastrous attack has been planned and realized from the American CIA and the Mossad with the aid of the zionists in order to put under accusation the Arabic Countries and in order to induce the western powers to take part are in Iraq are in Afghanistan".

Cossiga joins the growing movement of family members of those who perished on 9/11, engineers, scientists, government and intelligence personnel, etc. who seek the truth about 9/11.

Wednesday, March 05, 2008

VIDEO: Zeitgeist, The Movie

March 15, 2008 is Z-Day says Peter Joseph producer of "Zeitgeist, the Movie"—70,000 viewers daily.

During my 9/11 lecture tour of South Africa, I was often asked if I had seen it. I had tried a couple of times, but somehow never got to the end. Skip the first 40 minutes to jump to 9/11.

Sunday, March 02, 2008

Call for an international investigation of 9/11

Oscar-winner accuses America of fabricating 9/11

Marion Cotillard, the 32-year-old French actress, who received an Oscar last month for her performance as singer Edith Piaf in La Vie En Rose, openly questioned the truth behind the terrorist atrocity in an interview broadcast on a French website.

But, faced with losing millions as the notoriously patriotic Hollywood film industry reacted against her vitriol, Cotillard claimed there had been a misunderstanding.

Tuesday, February 12, 2008

9/11 'mastermind' Khalid Sheikh Mohammed charged

The Pentagon today charged Khalid Sheikh Mohammed with masterminding the events of September 11, 2001 even though the Pentagon's News Transcript of September 12, 2001 contradicts the 9/11 Commission Report's claim that the Pentagon was struck by a Boeing 757 on September 11, 2001.

At the September 12, 2001, U.S. Department of Defense (DoD) briefing, Arlington County Fire Chief Ed Plaugher when asked: "Is there anything left of the aircraft at all?" said: "there are some small pieces of aircraft ... there's no fuselage sections and that sort of thing."

Victoria Clarke, Assistant Secretary of Defense for Public Affairs - "presenter" of the DoD briefing to the world press, did not contradict Chief Plaugher, and CNN video of September 11, 2001 corroborates Ed Plauger's remarks at the DoD briefing.

Standing in front of the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, Jamie McIntyre, CNN's senior Pentagon correspondent since November 1992, reported: "From my close up inspection there's no evidence of a plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. . . . . The only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand. There are no large tail sections, wing sections, fuselage - nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon. . . . It wasn't till about 45 minutes later . . . that all of the floors collapsed."

"American Airlines," "Flight 77," "Boeing," "Dulles," and "passengers" are not mentioned in the News Transcript.

I just returned from a 3-week lecture tour of South Africa where, using establishment news sources, I showed to large audiences in about a dozen cities that the primary conclusions of "The 9/11 Commission Report" are false. A television interview broadcast to Sub-Saharan Africa summarizes this evidence.

In his new book, "The Commission: The Uncensored History of the 9/11 Investigation," New York Times investigative journalist Philip Shenon writes that Philip Zelikow, the 9/11 Commission's executive director attempted to intimidate staff to avoid findings that would be damaging to President George W Bush, who was running for re-election, and Condoleezza Rice, his then National Security Adviser. (Shenon apparently accepts the major conclusions of "The 9/11 Commission Report"— we do not.)

Tom Leonard of the British Telegraph wrote, "When Bob Kerrey, a Democrat member of the commission, learned the extent of Mr Zelikow's ties to the administration, he confronted Tom Kean, its Republican chairman. . . . Mr. Kerrey reportedly threatened to resign unless Mr Zelikow was sacked, but was persuaded to stay."

Sen. Max Cleland, resigned from the commission in November 2003 saying, "Bush is scamming America."

"The chair and vice chair of the 9/11 Commission, respectively Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, assert in their book, Without Precedent, that they were 'set up to fail' and were starved of funds to do a proper investigation", reported the Guardian.

The others charged by the Pentagon are: Walid Bin Attash, Ramzi Binalshibh, Ali Abd al-Aziz Ali, Mustafa Ahmad al-Hawsawi, and Mohammed al-Qahtani.

Wednesday, February 06, 2008

BOOK: 'The Commission'

"Missed evidence, ignored clues, political considerations—did the 9/11 Commission really issue the definitive report on the September 2001 terror attacks?", asks National Public Radio's Fresh Air from WHYY.

"In his new book, 'The Commission: The Uncensored History of the 9/11 Investigation,' New York Times investigative journalist Philip Shenon scrutinizes those charged with analyzing the terror attacks and uncovers new information about the commission's complicated relationship with the Bush White House."

"According to the book," writes the Telegraph, "Philip Zelikow, the 9/11 Commission's executive director, allegedly attempted to intimidate staff to avoid findings that would be damaging to President George W Bush, who was running for re-election, and Condoleezza Rice, his then National Security Adviser.

"When Bob Kerrey, a Democrat member of the commission, learned the extent of Mr Zelikow's ties to the administration, he confronted Tom Kean, its Republican chairman.

"Mr Kerrey reportedly threatened to resign unless Mr Zelikow was sacked, but was persuaded to stay."

Sen. Max Cleland, resigned from the commission in November 2003 saying, "Bush is scamming America."

"The chair and vice chair of the 9/11 Commission, respectively Thomas Kean and Lee Hamilton, assert in their book, Without Precedent, that they were "set up to fail" and were starved of funds to do a proper investigation", reported the Guardian.

Shenon says that raw data at the National Security Agency "seemed to suggest that the government of Iran and the militant group Hezbollah, had provided important assistance to some of the hijackers in the year and a half before the attack."

Shenon apparently accepts the major conclusions of "The 9/11 Commission Report"— we do not (see Fatally Flawed: The 9/11 Commission Report).

Saturday, January 12, 2008

BOOK: '9/11 Contradictions'

Bill Christison, former senior CIA official, says that David Ray Griffin's new book, "9/11 Contradictions," written "specifically for members of Congress and the media, has presented the often incredible but true details of 25 major contradictions in the Bush administration's accounts of 9/11. This book, based on careful research but written in a fast-moving, readable style, blows apart the notion that 'The 9/11 Commission Report' presents an accurate account of what happened on September 11."

Saturday, January 05, 2008

U.S. Dept. of State veterans challenge official account

Eight veterans of the U.S. Department of State have challenged the official account of 9/11 calling it “Flawed”, “Absurd”, “Totally Inadequate”, “a Cover-up".

Sunday, December 30, 2007

VIDEO: 9/11 What Really Happened

Watch Enver Masud's interview on iTV.

During his 3-week, 9/11 lecture tour of South Africa and Malawi, Enver was interviewed on iTV, South Africa, on November 30, 2007. The interview was broadcast via satellite to Sub-Saharan Africa.

Using official documents, photographs, and video clips, Enver debunks the official, conspiracy theory regarding the events of September 11, 2001.

Enver Masud is an engineer, and founder of The Wisdom Fund - a nonprofit corporation established in 1995.

Download the video before it disappears from the Internet, and share it with friends.

Friday, December 28, 2007

Mark Weitzman, Simon Wiesenthal Center, challenged

Richard Gage, architect, has demanded a retraction of "false, defamatory, outrageous and insulting statements" made by Mark Weitzman of the Simon Wiesenthal Center who, in testimony before the Homeland Security Subcommittee on Intelligence, Information Sharing, and Terrorism Risk Assessment, referred to AE911Truth.org as an "Incubator of 9/11 Conspiracies and Disinformation".

Gage's letter to Mark Weitzman makes the following points regarding the World Trade Center:
- The destruction occurred with rapid onset, at virtually free-fall speed, and with radial symmetry.
- One hundred eighteen first responders described hearing, seeing and feeling explosions and seeing flashes of light at the onset of destruction.
- The concrete floors were almost completely pulverized into dust and gravel.
- The structural steel framework was largely dismembered into shippable lengths. Much of it was hurled outside the Twin Towers' perimeters, some as far as 500 feet away.
- Tons of molten metal were seen by FDNY and others, and was described as "flowing like lava" for weeks after 9/11, yet its existence was denied by NIST.
- FEMA documented structural steel samples showing evidence of rapid oxidation, sulfidation, intergranular melting, and partial evaporation – features which occur only with temperatures at least 1,000° F. hotter than office or jet fuel fires.
- Proven chemical evidence of thermate, an incendiary material which produces molten iron as its by-product, found on the columns and beams, previously molten metal, and iron-rich micro-spheres in the dust by Dr. Steven Jones (and corroborated by the USGS but never explained).

"These features are characteristic of controlled demolitions, and not office or jet fuel fires", says Gage.

Tuesday, December 04, 2007

Enver Masud's 9/11 lecture tour of South Africa and Malawi

Enver Masud, founder of The Wisdom Fund, just returned from a 3-week lecture tour of South Africa and Malawi.

Using video clips from CNN, MSNBC, CBS, ABC, NBC, and Fox, plus photographs and official documents, Mr. Masud demonstrated that the major conclusions of "The 9/11 Commission Report"—the official, conspiracy theory—are false.

An iTV interview was broadcast to Sub-Saharan Africa via satellite. A one hour interview was broadcast across South Africa on SAfm—the American embassy declined SAfm's invitation to participate. Articles were published by local newspapers at most venues. The talk is available on the Internet as a slide and film presentation.

The following lists the venues and attendance:

Stanger, Nov 13: Enver Masud gave a talk at Kwa Zulu Natal town hall—about 200 attended.

Durban, Nov 14: Formal dinner of the Islamic Medical Association. Enver Masud gave the 45-minutes, keynote speech—about 600 attended.

Pietermaritzburg, Nov 15: Mixed crowd of about 250 at the beautiful campus of Kwa Zulu Natal University. Those attending included Yusuf Bamji, a member of the provincial parliament, and reporters from the Natal Witness (oldest paper in SA), Mercury, Independent Online, and Publica. Next day Enver was interviewed by Sharon Dell for the Natal Witness.

Durban, Nov 16: Venue changed at last minute to Sufi Hall in order to accommodate a larger than expected crowd. Overflow crowd of 600 to 700.

Port Shepstone, Nov 17: About 600 attended talk at Port Shepstone Islamic School.

Newcastle, Nov 18: About 450 attended talk at Checkers Hall.

Ladysmith, Nov 19: About 500 attended talk at Islamic Educational Centre.

Cape Town, Nov 20: Talk during lunch at Muslim Judicial Council. Interview on Voice of the Cape radio. About 600 attended talk at Town Hall.

Cape Town, Nov 21: Lunch with small group from the Islamic Medical Association. One hour interview on Radio 786. Talk at Dar-ul-Islam—about 480 attended.

Pietersburg, Nov 22: About 350 attended talk at Pietersburg Town Hall. Interview with Channel Islam during drive back next day to Johannesburg.

Johannesburg, Nov 23: Interview on iTV by Imam Sayed. About 750 attended talk at Nur-ul-Islam Centre.

Johannesburg, Nov 24: About 350 attended talk at Dar-ul-Islam Zakiriya. About 350 attended talk at the Institute of Social Sciences. Dinner talk with group of about 50 influential persons videotaped by iTV.

Johannesburg, Nov 26: One hour interview on Channel Islam.

Blantyre (Malawi), Nov 26: About 50 attended talk at Malawi Sun Conference Centre.

Zomba (Malawi), Nov 27: About 50 attended talk at Chancellor College.

Limbe (Malawi), Nov 28: Lunch with small group at Limbe Rotary Club.

Johannesburg, Nov 29. Talk at Roshnee Civic Hall—about 500 attended.

Johannesburg, Nov 30. One hour interview by Ashraf Garda on SAfm (very popular national talk radio). The U.S. embassy was given two weeks to provide a representative for the interview, but did not respond. Talk at Masjid al Takwa, Lenasia. One hour interview on iTV by Shamshad Sayed broadcast to 20 plus countries.

Port Elizabeth, Dec 1: Interview on KQFM in township that was the home of many of South Africa's ruling party. Talk at Masjid Takwa. Brief talk at Assaidaat Foundation dinner—about 500 attended.

Port Elizabeth, Dec 2: Interviewed by Shaanaaz De Jager for The Herald. Brief talk at Masjid Mansour, Eutinhage. Talk at Movement Hall—about 350 attended.

At each venue there were articles and ads, some full page, in local papers, plus posters announcing Enver’s appearance.

For more on 9/11, and articles by Enver Masud, visit The Wisdom Fund.

Sunday, November 11, 2007

Enver Masud on 9/11 lecture tour of South Africa

Enver Masud, founder of The Wisdom Fund, leaves today on a 10-city, 2-week lecture tour of South Africa where he will present evidence debunking the official, 9/11 conspiracy theory.

His presentation, "Fatally Flawed: The 9/11 Commission Report," plus the introduction and summary of conclusions are available on the Internet.

To ease into digesting the new, and probably unfamiliar, information on 9/11 summarized in his presentation, Masud recommends starting with his article on the Pentagon attack.

Multiple appearances are scheduled for Masud in Benoni, Cape Town, Durban, Johannesburg, Ladysmith, Newcastle, Pietersburg, Pietermaritzburg, Port Shepstone, and Stanger.

In Cape Town, Masud is scheduled to meet with MPs and Ministers. He is also scheduled to be interviewed on prime time TV, and on a popular, national radio show.

"It's time," says Masud, "for truth, justice and peace movements to join with the 9/11 truth movement in debunking the official, 9/11 conspiracy theory. Organizations such as CAIR, ICNA, ISNA, and MPAC have a special obligation since Muslims have borne the brunt of the U.S. war on terror launched in response to 9/11."

Masud's tour was organized by the Research And Information Network (RAIN) in Durban.

Tuesday, November 06, 2007

Sunday, October 28, 2007

CNN's Jamie McIntyre rebuts official account of Pentagon attack

Standing in front of the Pentagon on September 11, 2001, CNN's senior Pentagon correspondent since November 1992, Jamie McIntyre reported: "From my close up inspection there's no evidence of the plane having crashed anywhere near the Pentagon. . . . . The only pieces left that you can see are small enough that you could pick up in your hand. There are no large tail section, wing section, fuselage nothing like that anywhere around which would indicate that the entire plane crashed into the side of the Pentagon."

Fire Chief Ed Plaugher corroborates Jamie McIntyre's report. At a Dept. of Defense News Briefing, presented by Assistant Secretary Victoria Clarke on September 12, 2001 at 10:16 a.m., when asked: "Is there anything left of the aircraft at all?" said: "there are some small pieces of aircraft ... there's no fuselage sections and that sort of thing."

McIntyre's bio at CNN reads: "Six months after the Sept. 11 terrorist attacks, McIntyre's contacts provided security camera pictures of American Airlines Flight 77 hitting the Pentagon, images aired first on CNN."

Wednesday, October 17, 2007

Tuesday, October 16, 2007

NIST 'unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse'

NIST has admitted what was clear from a careful reading of their reports that the simulations they conducted went as far as collapse initiation. They do not explain the total collapse of the World Trade Center towers. The following are quotes from a NIST letter dated September 27, 2007.

B. NIST Computer Simulations: "NIST has used an extensive database of photographic and video evidence to validate the models used to analyze the behavior of the towers up to the point of initiation of collapse."

E. The WTC Steel Temperature: "While NIST did not find evidence that any of the recovered core columns experienced temperatures in excess of 250C, it is not possible to extrapolate from such a small sample size to state that none of the core columns on the fire affected floors reached temperatures in excess of 250C."

F. The Goal of the WTC Report and Its Overall Analysis: "NIST has stated that it did not analyze the collapse of the towers. NIST carried its analysis to the point where the buildings reached global instability. . . . we were unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse."

A draft report, long delayed, of the 47-story World Trade Center building 7 has yet to be released.

Wednesday, October 10, 2007

FBI contradicts reports of phone calls from planes

"[T]wo low-altitude calls from Flight 93 were, according to the FBI report, the only two cell phone calls made from all four flights," writes author David Ray Griffin. Last year, according to Griffin, American Airlines said that their "757s in 2001 had no onboard phones".

Monday, October 08, 2007

95 years before 9/11, Gandhi launched 'truth-force'

On September 11, 1906, Mohandas K. Gandhi, a 37-year old lawyer, rose to address the packed Empire Theatre in Johannesburg, South Africa. This speech was the first salvo in the non-violent movement that would overthrow the British Empire. The movement came to be known as Satyagraha—the force which is born of truth and love or nonviolence.

Wednesday, October 03, 2007

FBI refuses to confirm identities of 9/11 aircraft

The Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI) has denied a Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request #1093127-000 (or #1083127-000) for documentation confirming the recovery and positive identification of debris from the four aircraft identified with September 11, 2001.

Friday, September 28, 2007

Wednesday, September 12, 2007

Sample letter to Congress for hearings on 9/11

AN OPEN LETTER TO CONCERNED AMERICANS
AND THE 9/11 TRUTH MOVEMENT


From Enver Masud, Founder and CEO, The Wisdom Fund

Many of you have been lobbying for a new 9/11 investigation. Getting that is a long term process, and it may not be any more productive than the investigation that NIST is conducting right now.

Having managed the National Power Grid Study (150 persons organized into 26 multidisciplinary teams—received Award of Excellence) for the U.S. Department of Energy, I know first-hand the pressures within the Executive Branch to subvert the process. Any new investigation will face the same pressures.

But we can do something that has a very good chance of success, and will break the media silence on 9/11. Ask for hearings in the House and Senate on the specific issues below.

Send a letter to your congressman and senators (personalize the sample below) asking them to hold hearings on these issues.


---begin sample letter---

Dear Congressman or Senator:

Over 500 scientists, engineers, professors, and aviation, intelligence, and government personnel now question "The 9/11 Commission Report". Polls show that a substantial number of US citizens, and others worldwide, also have doubts about the report's accuracy.

Like many of these scientists and engineers, I believe that "The 9/11 Commission Report" is fatally flawed -- see http://www.twf.org/Gallery/911talk.html.

To stop the drain on American blood and treasure, restore Americans' trust in government, and to restore America's standing worldwide, it is imperative that we obtain the truth about 9/11. We urge you to hold hearings focussed on the following issues:

1 - World Trade Center: Why did three buildings (47-story Building 7 was not even hit by a plane) collapse symmetrically at near free-fall speed -- about 10 seconds for WTC Buildings 1 and 2; less than 7 seconds for WTC Building 7?

2 - Pentagon: What is the hard evidence that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon (eg. serial numbers matched to serial numbers in aircraft maintenance logs), what explains the “strange absence of airliner debris”, and what caused the exit hole in C Ring?

3 - Flight 93: Why was there "nothing larger than a phone book" at the crash site, and debris from the plane spread over a few miles?

4 - Bin Laden and the hijackers: Why does the FBI's Most Wanted poster for Bin Laden not charge him with 9/11 while British media claim that some of the hijackers are alive, and there are no Arab names on the airlines' 9/11 passenger lists available to the public?

For background and links to sources see http://911sig.blogspot.com/2007/09/ask-three-questions-to-debunk-911. html.

The correct answers to these questions should go a long ways toward unravelling the truth about 9/11.

Signed, Name, Address, Phone


---end sample letter---

Together we can get to the truth about 9/11. Write to your congressman and senators today. You can use the form at http://www.visi.com/juan/congress/.

Download handout for lobbying, contacting media, etc.

If you wish to stay informed, subscribe to The Wisdom Fund.

Monday, September 10, 2007

Questions to debunk 'The 9/11 Commission Report'

World Trade Center: Why did three buildings (47-story Building 7 was not even hit by a plane) collapse symmetrically at near free-fall speed — about 10 seconds for WTC Buildings 1 and 2; less than 7 seconds for WTC Building 7?

Pentagon: What is the hard evidence that Flight 77 hit the Pentagon (eg. serial numbers matched to serial numbers in aircraft maintenance logs), what explains the “strange absence of airliner debris”, and what caused the exit hole in C Ring?

Flight 93: Why was there "nothing larger than a phone book" at the crash site, and debris from the plane spread over a few miles?

Bin Laden and the hijackers: Why does the FBI's Most Wanted poster for Bin Laden not charge him with 9/11 while British media claim that some of the hijackers are alive, and there are no Arab names on the airlines' 9/11 passenger lists available to the public?

More at Fatally Flawed: The 9/11 Commission Report by Enver Masud — founder, The Wisdom Fund.

Sunday, September 09, 2007

300,000 Manhattan residents at risk from WTC debris

"Up to 70 percent of first responders are ill as a result of 9/11 contamination. If a similar rate of illness holds true for those who lived and worked near the Twin Towers, the number of seriously ill New Yorkers could climb to 300,000 in the near future."

Saturday, September 08, 2007

Aljazeera's transcript of Bin Laden's message to Americans

Is it Bin Laden in the video, or is it a fake meant to convince skeptics that Bin Laden was responsible for 9/11? A blogger claims the video is a forgery. A viewer notes "that at the times at which the video is frozen is the only time at which this fake talks about current events." A writer asks, "How likely is it that OBL who is a strict adherent of fundamental Islam, would dye his beard and trim it to appear in front of a camera". Has al-Jazeera been "neutered"?

Wednesday, September 05, 2007

Challenge to publisher of Skeptic Magazine

The following is the text of an email sent to Michael Shermer who appeared on the Colbert Report today:

Mr. Shermer "The 9/11 Commission Report" is fatally flawed.

Just this week Dr. Lynn Margulis (recipient of the National Medal of Science, America's highest honor for scientific achievement) called the events of September 11, 2001 “this new false-flag operation, which has been used to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as unprecedented assaults on research, education, and civil liberties”.

As a consulting engineer since 1987, I have advised top officials in Albania, Egypt, Ethiopia, Ghana, Indonesia, Latvia, Pakistan, Russia, Tanzania, and the United States. I've also worked for the World Bank, USAID, U.S. Department of Energy (where I managed 26 teams to conduct the National Power Grid Study), District of Columbia Public Service Commission, the Iowa Corporation Commission, and for the U.S. private sector.

I've been skeptical of the official version of 9/11 since early 2002. I've summarized my findings in a slide presentation. I have a blog. And this Saturday we're having a "9/11 Teach-In" in Arlington.

I challenge the Skeptics Society to find fault with my conclusions.

Enver Masud
Founder and CEO
The Wisdom Fund
www.twf.org

'9/11 Teach-In' on September 8 in Arlington, VA

The Wisdom Fund—www.twf.org presents "9/11 Teach-In".

WHERE: NRECA Conference Center, 4301 Wilson Blvd., Arlington, VA
FREE PARKING: Garage under NRECA building—entrance on Taylor Street. Entrance open 11:00 AM to 3:00 PM only—exit by 10:00 PM.
METRORAIL: Get off at Ballston on the Orange Line. Go one block West, and two blocks South to the NRECA building—entrance on Taylor Street. Conference rooms are on the left .
ADMISSION: $10

Media Sponsor: WPFW 89.3 FM—a Pacifica Station, Washington, DC

Tuesday, September 04, 2007

VIDEO: 'How The Towers Fell'

Richard Gage, AIA, Architect gives a technical analysis of the World Trade Center controlled demolition on September 11, 2001.

Israel and the 9/11 cover-up

Saturday, September 01, 2007

Prominent scientist calls 9/11 'false-flag operation'

A prominent American scientist, Dr. Lynn Margulis, has called the events of September 11, 2001 “this new false-flag operation, which has been used to justify the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq as well as unprecedented assaults on research, education, and civil liberties”.

Dr. Margulis was elected to the National Academy of Sciences in 1983 and served as Chairman of the Academy’s Space Science Board Committee on Planetary Biology and Chemical Evolution.  In 1999, President Bill Clinton presented Dr. Margulis with the National Medal of Science, America's highest honor for scientific achievement.

Sunday, August 26, 2007

History Channel presents '9/11 Conspiracies: Fact or Fiction'

It doesn't take long to figure out whose side the History Channel is on. According to the History Channel "The 9/11 Commission Report" is not a conspiracy theory—the other theories are. Those speaking in support of "The 9/11 Commission Report" are "Experts"—others are not so designated.

Beyond the obvious bias the History Channel makes no effort to explain why Bin Laden is not wanted for 9/11 by the FBI, the lack of Arab names on the passenger lists, why airplane parts at the Pentagon were not matched to their serial numbers, why the government refuses to release photos from Pentagon cameras and the film it confiscated from the Sheraton Hotel and the nearby gas station, the presence of molten metal in the basement of World Trade Center 1 and 2, the lack of any government explanation for the speed with which World Trade Center 1, 2, and 7 collapsed, . . .

Saturday, August 25, 2007

Mainstream journalist questions the 'truth' about 9/11

Robert Fisk, a highly respected journalist on the Middle East, admits he is "increasingly troubled at the inconsistencies in the official narrative of 9/11. It's not just the obvious non sequiturs: where are the aircraft parts (engines, etc) from the attack on the Pentagon? Why have the officials involved in the United 93 flight (which crashed in Pennsylvania) been muzzled? Why did flight 93's debris spread over miles when it was supposed to have crashed in one piece in a field? . . .

"If it is true, for example, that kerosene burns at 820C under optimum conditions, how come the steel beams of the twin towers – whose melting point is supposed to be about 1,480C – would snap through at the same time? (They collapsed in 8.1 and 10 seconds.) What about the third tower – the so-called World Trade Centre Building 7 (or the Salmon Brothers Building) – which collapsed in 6.6 seconds in its own footprint at 5.20pm on 11 September?"

Tuesday, August 21, 2007

NIST Fire Science Division Chief calls for independent review

"James Quintiere, Ph.D., former Chief of the Fire Science Division of the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), has called for an independent review of NIST’s investigation into the collapses of the World Trade Center Towers on 9/11" writes Alan Miller in opednews.com.

Monday, August 13, 2007

Sunday, August 05, 2007

Saturday, August 04, 2007

Watch for another 9/11-WMD experience

A number of pundits have concluded that the reason the Democrats have not brought a halt to Bush’s follies is that they expect Bush’s unpopular policies to provide them with a landslide victory next year.  

There is a problem with this reasoning. It assumes that Cheney, Rove, and the Republicans are ignorant of these facts or are content for the Republican Party to be destroyed after Bush has his warmonger-police state fling. “After me, the deluge.”

Isn’t it more likely that Cheney and Rove have in mind events that will, once again, rally the people behind President Bush and the Republican Party that is fighting the “war on terror” that the Democrats “want to lose”?